It’s been about a year since I converted my my primary home computing stations to the Linux-based Pop! OS. Am I still happy with that decision? Absolutely. It hasn’t been all upside, but it has been more than worth it. Here’s what’s changed during the last twelve months.
Writing The Other was also instructive along other lines. There are a couple of major selling points behind both Manuskript and Scrivener, and I discovered that I don’t actually need either of these tools.
One major feature is the ability to drag and drop scenes around a hierarchical tree of your draft, dynamically rearranging the scenes like files in a file system. Performing such rearrangement would be an enormous chore in a single, flat text document, but Scrivener and Manuskript make it easy. It seems like a cool feature. I certainly thought so when I first picked up a Scrivener license eight years ago, but I have never once used this feature. It’s just not how I write. I have added scenes. I have deleted scenes. But I have never once affected the kind of mass reorganization that would make this feature useful, not even for my first novel, Voyage Embarkation.
Another cool feature is the ability to represent each scene in your novel as a notecard, upon which you can write plot synopses, allowing you to have your outline also be the framework into which you insert your novel scene by scene. This feature is one I have utilized extensively, but more so at the beginning of my writing career than as of late. In fact, as my writing skill has advanced, I’ve been able to hold more of my outline in my head. I appreciate having had access to this feature for Voyage, Insomnium, and Alterra. But for my workflow these days, it is not particularly compelling.
What I realized while writing The Other was that, while all these fancy organizational features are kind of nice for me, none of them are necessary. I just need a fully functioning document editor that will do a reasonable amount of auto-formatting for me. Being faced with the odious task of replacing all straight quotes with the correctly-facing curly quotes in a fifty thousand word manuscript really drove this point home.
I have subsequently moved both my fiction and blog writing into LibreOffice Writer, and that’s working out great so far. I’m also impressed with LibreOffice in terms of functionality and usability. I don’t miss Microsoft Word one jot.
My new favorite language is Rust, and everything about the development experience on Linux is smooth and efficient. I set up my coding environment in one desktop workspace and get my music going in another.
I ran into this when attempting to lay out the design for The Shipwright and Other Stories last year. Scribus performed well for a document of zero to fifty pages. Any more than that, and it started to chug. It seemed odd that this was happening even on my fairly beefy hardware, and when I went searching into my activity monitor, I discovered the culprit—Scribus was only capable of utilizing a single CPU. And the official Scribus recommendation? Make many small PDFs and glue them together. That might work for a novel like Schrödinger’s City, where the longest chapter is around twenty pages, but for a novel like The Other, which is composed of three sections, each around one hundred pages long without page breaks between scenes, it’s a complete non-starter.
In this and only this, I have gone back to using my old Mac. I picked up a copy of Affinity Publisher and I couldn’t be happier. It is just what I needed. It was a $50 flat fee (no monthly charge like Adobe), and it is, in many ways, superior to Adobe InDesign. Especially after my experience with Scribus, I particularly like that I can lay out a three hundred page book in a single document and scroll through a thumbnail version of it.
Desktop publish is the only thing I remain dependent on Mac OS X for.